anti dumping agreement article 6 case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
anti dumping agreement article 6 case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
It's also important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual length of service pretty much violates your entire service framework as being a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming this kind of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention with the legislation nor with the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
The official court record is maintained because of the court of record. Copies of case file documents are not out there about the search site and will need to become ordered from the court of record.
However it's made crystal clear that police is free to consider action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities topic to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make certain regard of the family drop in accordance with regulation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they could act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate for a issue of security from the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be realized. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated over. Read more
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to perform away with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health check here Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out away with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, which include Congress at both the federal and state levels. Whilst this form of regulation strives to shape our society, offering rules and guidelines, it would be extremely hard for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the discovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a properly-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.